Support OpenDurham.org
Preserve Durham's History with a Donation to Open Durham Today!
OpenDurham.org is dedicated to preserving and sharing the rich history of our community. Run by our parent nonprofit, Preservation Durham, the site requires routine maintence and upgrades. We do not ask for support often, but today, we're asking you to chip in to help us reach our goal of raising $7,500 for annual maintenance by the end of the year. Your support allows us to maintain this valuable resource, expand our archives, and keep the history of Durham accessible to everyone.
Every contribution, big or small, makes a difference. Help us keep Durham's history alive for future generations.
Comments
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 12/7/2006 - 6:31am
Thanks for introducing the "enclosure" term. I've often talked about how I love Amsterdam for its "human" scale -- 3 and 4 storey buildings set back from the canals by a width of two curbs, 1-1/2 car lanes, and a patio.
Me want more of that.
--Phil
Submitted by Sven (not verified) on Thu, 12/7/2006 - 3:32pm
Phil
If you ever get the chance, take a look at "Great Streets". It's a great book, with lots of line drawings/measurements of urban streetscapes, Amsterdam included.
Unfortunately, getting to enclosure becomes difficult in our fragmented planning environment. DOT owns Duke St., and all they care about is whether traffic is free-flowing or not. This part of Duke St. is covered by the relatively-new DDO, which has some aesthetic stipulations (like setbacks, height limits, and materials), but stops short of minimum heights.
GK
Submitted by crisp (not verified) on Sat, 12/9/2006 - 5:18pm
I'm no expert or anything, but when I think/hear about zoning and building height limits it usually has to do with maximum limits. I'd never really thought of minimum heighths before as being so important to ensuring pedestrian comfort but it makes a lot of sense. Great post.
Submitted by Sven (not verified) on Sat, 12/9/2006 - 6:19pm
Crisp
You're absolutely right - maximum height limits are a very traditional part of zoning, primarily dating back to height limits for fighting fires when zoning was first established in the early 20th century. Ideas like minimum heights are relatively new and becoming a bit more common with the increasing acceptance of form-based codes. But it's still quite uncommon.
Glad you enjoyed the post - thanks for the comment
GK
Add new comment
Log in or register to post comments.